IPCRF NCOI MOV's

For DepEd PMES/RPMS KRA 4 (Professional Engagement and Personal Growth), the Non-Classroom Observable Indicators (NCOIs) are assessed through your Means of Verification (MOVs), Portfolio Annotation, and Behavioral Events Interview (BEI). Teachers are not required to prepare new MOVs; existing RPMS/PMES documents from the last three rating periods may be used. �

Department of Education +1

Here are common KRA 4 NCOIs, sample MOVs, and the corresponding performance ratings:

KRA 4 NCOI

Sample MOVs

Required Rating

Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to improve teaching practice

LAC attendance, minutes, reflection journal, certificates

Outstanding (5), Very Satisfactory (4), Satisfactory (3), Unsatisfactory (2), Poor (1)

Engaged in professional learning to enhance teaching practice

Certificates of training, seminar reports, action plans, learning logs

5–1 scale

Applied professional knowledge gained from training to classroom practice

Lesson plans, instructional materials, reflection, implementation report

5–1 scale

Demonstrated professional collaboration with colleagues and stakeholders

Meeting documentation, committee reports, communication records, project reports

5–1 scale

RPMS/PMES Rating Scale

5.000–4.500 – Outstanding (O)

4.499–3.500 – Very Satisfactory (VS)

3.499–2.500 – Satisfactory (S)

2.499–1.500 – Unsatisfactory (U)

1.499–1.000 – Poor (P) �

pdfcoffee.com

If you're asking about the new Career Progression (Teacher I–VII / Master Teacher) NCOI requirements, let me know the position you're applying for (e.g., Teacher IV, Teacher V, Teacher VI, Teacher VII, MT I, MT II, or MT III), and I'll provide the exact NCOIs, required MOVs, and minimum rating for that position.

KRA 5 – Objective 5.2.2 (NCOI)

PPST Indicator 5.2.2: Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills. For promotion, this indicator is assessed as a Non-Classroom Observable Indicator (NCOI) through Portfolio Annotation (MOVs) and Behavioral Events Interview (BEI). Existing RPMS/PMES MOVs from the last three rating periods may be used—no new MOVs are required. �

Department of Education +2

Suggested MOVs

Intervention/Remediation Plan for learners with literacy or numeracy needs

Progress Monitoring Tool or Learner Progress Report

Item Analysis and Intervention Report

Reading or Numeracy Program documentation

Lesson plans/DLLs showing differentiated intervention strategies

Assessment tools with analyzed results

LAC documents or coaching records related to literacy/numeracy intervention

Teacher reflection or narrative on intervention outcomes

Parent communication records supporting learner intervention

Before-and-after learner performance data demonstrating improvement �

Department of Education +1

Respective Rating Scale

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor

PMES transmutation:

4.500–5.000 = Outstanding (5)

3.500–4.499 = Very Satisfactory (4)

2.500–3.499 = Satisfactory (3)

1.500–2.499 = Unsatisfactory (2)

1.000–1.499 = Poor (1) �

Department of Education

If you need the official rubric for 5.2.2 (what evidence earns a rating of 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1), I can provide the detailed rating descriptors used by DepEd assessors

For KRA 5, the required NCOIs, suggested MOVs, and performance rating are as follows:

PPST Indicator 5.2.2

Indicator: Monitors and evaluates learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data. �

Google Sites +1

Suggested MOVs:

Learner progress monitoring reports

Item analysis and intervention plan

Class achievement report

Reading or numeracy intervention documentation

Assessment results with analysis

Teacher reflection on learner progress

Evidence of implemented interventions and learner improvement �

Department of Education

Required Rating:

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor �

Department of Education

PPST Indicator 5.4.2

Indicator: Communicates promptly and clearly the learners' needs, progress, and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians. �

Google Sites +1

Suggested MOVs:

Parent-teacher conference records

Communication logs or correspondence with parents

Learner progress reports/report cards

Homeroom meeting minutes

Parent acknowledgment forms

Adviser's reports

Reflection on stakeholder communication �

Department of Education +1

Required Rating:

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor �

Department of Education

If your concern is for Teacher IV, Teacher V, Teacher VI, Teacher VII, or Master Teacher promotion, I can also provide the �⁠official Portfolio Annotation (PAF) guide, including the �⁠MOV examples that correspond to ratings 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 for each indicator.

For the DepEd Career Progression System (Teacher I–VII), here are the details for the indicators you asked about.

KRA 7 – PPST Indicator 7.1.2 (COI)

Indicator: Maintains learning environments that promote fairness, respect, and care to encourage learner responsibility and positive behavior.

Common MOVs:

Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet

Annotated Daily Lesson Log (DLL) or Detailed Lesson Plan (DLP)

Classroom management plan or behavior management strategies

Photos or documentation of the learning environment (if applicable)

Reflection on classroom management practices

Respective Rating:

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor

KRA 5 – PPST Indicator 5.2.2 (NCOI)

Indicator: Uses assessment data to monitor learner progress and improve teaching and learning.

Common MOVs:

Learner progress monitoring reports

Item analysis

Intervention/remediation plan

Assessment results with analysis

Documentation of literacy/numeracy interventions

Teacher reflection on learner improvement

Respective Rating:

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor

Note: For Career Progression, the actual score (1–5) is determined by the assessor based on the quality and sufficiency of your evidence (MOVs), portfolio annotation, and—where applicable—classroom observation or behavioral events interview. There is no fixed rating assigned to a particular MOV; the MOV only serves as evidence to support the rating.

Here are the details for the two PPST indicators you asked about under the DepEd Career Progression System (ECP).

KRA 7 – PPST Indicator 7.5.2 (COI)

Indicator: Performs various professional roles and responsibilities that contribute to the teaching profession and the school community.

Possible MOVs (Means of Verification):

Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet

Annotated Daily Lesson Log (DLL) or Detailed Lesson Plan (DLP)

Documents showing leadership or committee responsibilities integrated into teaching

Evidence of participation in school programs and activities

Reflection on professional roles and responsibilities

Performance Rating:

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor

KRA 5 – PPST Indicator 5.2.2 (NCOI)

Indicator: Uses assessment data to monitor learner progress and improve teaching and learning.

Possible MOVs (Means of Verification):

Learner progress monitoring reports

Assessment results with analysis

Item analysis

Intervention or remediation plan

Documentation of literacy/numeracy interventions

Reflection on the effectiveness of interventions

Performance Rating:

5 – Outstanding

4 – Very Satisfactory

3 – Satisfactory

2 – Unsatisfactory

1 – Poor

Important: Under the current DepEd Career Progression System, MOVs themselves do not carry a fixed rating. Assessors assign the 1–5 rating after evaluating:

the relevance and quality of the MOVs,

your portfolio annotation,

and, for COIs, your classroom observation results.